Dispute, Harm, Crime, and Conflict: Narrative Positioning in Justice Practice

Doctoral Dissertation
Jennifer Langdon
Daniel Rothbart
Committee Chair
Sandra Cheldelin
Committee Member
Devon Johnson
Committee Member
Dispute, Harm, Crime, and Conflict: Narrative Positioning in Justice Practice
Publication Date:November 30, 2006
Pages:173
Download: Proquest
Abstract

This dissertation describes the changing discourse surrounding conflict resolution as justice practice. By redefining crime in various ways---as dispute, as harm, and as conflict---conflict resolution and restorative justice practitioners construct alternative narratives of crime. Positioning theory is used as a tool to analyze practitioner narratives of community mediation, victim offender mediation and community conferencing practice. These alternative practices are understood as primarily narrative interventions, providing participants with narrative agency to recreate their identities in the aftermath of wrongdoing. Thus the malignant positioning of offenders and victims inherent in criminal court processing of crime is counteracted.

S-CAR.GMU.EDU | Copyright © 2017
Dissertations
Leadership For Peace And Reconciliation In Post-Violent Sub-Saharan African Countries
Understanding the causes of longstanding antagonism in eastern DRC: Why neighbors fail to co-exist.
Trans Lives in Patrolled Spaces: Stories of Precarity, Policing, and Policy in Washington, D.C.
Nurturing Resistance: The Politics of Migration and Gendered Activism in Mexico
Social Identity Balance and Implications for Collective Action