Mixed Reaction to Myanmar Opposition Party Boycott
Ph.D. Sociology, with interdisciplinary certificate in Social Theory and Comparative History., University of California, Davis
M.A., Sociology, The New School for Social Research, Graduate Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, New York, NY
Excerpt:
The party's leaders and members have often faced detention and closure of party offices. Now the country's principal opposition movement could face virtual eradication since it will no longer be a legal organization.
"Without parliamentary representation, the NLD runs the risk of losing its substantive political following and being reduced to a 'silent majority,'" said Professor Monique Skidmore, a Myanmar expert at the University of Canberra. "But it's a crafty political decision and it is fundamentally a moral one."
Since the election laws were only enacted this month, there has been little time for parties to form and mobilize, and so the election lineup in this ethnically diverse nation is still unclear. But it appears the military will field a party against a number of small ones, some of them pro-military.
"The NLD's boycott represents an act of bold leadership and a call for solidarity among actors in civil society who are opposed to the regime. But it is a dangerous and risky strategy," said John Dale, a conflict resolution specialist at Virginia's George Mason University.
The junta hopes holding the vote will ease pressure for political reforms and accommodation with the country's pro-democracy movement. Yet international doubts over the fairness of the polls are now likely deepen despite recent efforts by the United States and other governments to engage more actively with the junta.
"The NLD's boycott is a call to the international community to shake a stick where the carrot of recent political engagement has failed," Dale said.
U.S. State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley told reporters that U.S. officials "understand and respect" the NLD decision. "This is a reflection of the unwillingness of the government in Burma to take what we thought were the necessary steps to open up the political process and to engage in serious dialogue," Crowley said.
This material is presented as the original analysis of analysts at S-CAR and is distributed without profit and for educational purposes. Attribution to the copyright holder is provided whenever available as is a link to the original source. Reproduction of copyrighted material is subject to the requirements of the copyright owner. Visit the original source of this material to determine restrictions before reproducing it. To request the alteration or removal of this material please email [email protected].
rosters
IMPORTANT LINKS
- Home
- Admissions
- Academics
- Research & Practice
- Center for Peacemaking Practice
- Center for the Study of Gender and Conflict
- Center for the Study of Narrative and Conflict Resolution
- Center for World Religions, Diplomacy, and Conflict Resolution
- Indonesia - U.S. Youth Leadership Program
- Dialogue and Difference
- Insight Conflict Resolution Program
- Parents of the Field Project
- Program on History, Memory, and Conflict
- Project on Contentious Politics
- Sudan Task Group
- Undergraduate Experiential Learning Project
- Zones of Peace Survey
- News & Events
- Student and Career Services
- Alumni
- Giving