Home › Journal Articles Roster › Why Americans fight: Justifications for asymmetric warfare
Why Americans fight: Justifications for asymmetric warfare
S-CAR Journal Article
Richard Rubenstein
+ More
- Hide
University Professor of Conflict Resolution and Public Affairs
Qualification:
J.D., Harvard Law School
Litt.D. (honoris causa), University of Malta
Topics of Interest:
Advocacy, Basic Human Needs, Race & Racism, Narrative, Civil Society, Facilitation, Class and Social Stratification, Psychosocial, Conflict Resolution, Middle East, Research, Culture, North America, Structural Violence, Training, Dialogue, Education, Ethics, Western Europe, Identity, Human Rights, International Relations, Justice, Law/Legal, Media, Narrative, Politics, Religion, Terrorism, Violence
Awards and Honor:
Why Americans fight: Justifications for asymmetric warfare
Authors: Richard Rubenstein
DOI: 10.1080/17467580903159235
Published Date: June 25, 2009
Abstract
Popular justifications for war in the USA have long been based on normative values embodied in America's civil religion, including a sacred right of self-defense. Over time, these justificatory rationales have been adapted and expanded to generate public support for asymmetric wars. An early example of this – the First Seminole War – may help us understand subsequent transformations of the doctrine of self-defense in the light of America's later “superpower” status.
Articles By this Author
Related Articles